<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Arrfab's Blog &#187; Cluster</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.arrfab.net/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=5" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.arrfab.net/blog</link>
	<description>Linux tips and tricks ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:54:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>DRBD backported (or not) to 2.6.32 in EL6 ?</title>
		<link>http://www.arrfab.net/blog/?p=224</link>
		<comments>http://www.arrfab.net/blog/?p=224#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fabian.arrotin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux-ha]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arrfab.net/blog/?p=224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As some of you already know it, DRBD is now (since kernel 2.6.33) part of the mainline/upstream kernel. Some were expecting RHEL6 to come with that kernel (used for Fedora 13). The latest RHEL6beta2 still comes with 2.6.32, which doesn&#8217;t include DRBD support. Of course we still don&#8217;t know what the &#8216;frozen&#8217; RHEL6 kernel will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As some of you already know it, DRBD is now (since kernel 2.6.33) <a href="http://www.drbd.org/download/mainline/" target="_blank">part of the mainline/upstream kernel</a>. Some were expecting RHEL6 to come with that kernel (used for Fedora 13). The latest RHEL6beta2 still comes with 2.6.32, which doesn&#8217;t include DRBD support. Of course we still don&#8217;t know what the &#8216;frozen&#8217; RHEL6 kernel will be but on the other hand, we know that Red Hat quite often &#8216;backports&#8217; modules from newer kernel into the RHEL kernel. What about DRBD ? At the time of writing this blog post, it seems still undecided, but you can follow the <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585309" target="_blank">DRBD RFE on Upstream Bugzilla </a>to get a clue, or even comment on it if you have a bugzilla account to  make hear your voice. On the other hand, you can still be sure that even if DRBD isn&#8217;t part of EL6, CentOS will still ship it in the <a href="http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories" target="_blank">Extras repository</a>, like for EL4/EL5 &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arrfab.net/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=224</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>virt-install / xen domU &#8216;out of memory&#8217; issue</title>
		<link>http://www.arrfab.net/blog/?p=149</link>
		<comments>http://www.arrfab.net/blog/?p=149#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 14:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fabian.arrotin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[CentOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cluster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.arrfab.net/blog/?p=149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had today to deploy two CentOS 5.3 xen dom0 on two blades and then some domU&#8217;s guests. Everything was fine except that when i used our traditionnal deploydomU script (which uses virt-install) it directly complained about memory issue. The exact message was &#8221; &#8216;Out of memory&#8217;, &#8220;xc_dom_boot_mem_init: can&#8217;t allocate low memory for domain\n &#8221; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had today to deploy two CentOS 5.3 xen dom0 on two blades and then some domU&#8217;s guests. Everything was fine except that when i used our traditionnal deploydomU script (which uses virt-install) it directly complained about memory issue. The exact message was &#8221; &#8216;<strong>Out of memory&#8217;, &#8220;xc_dom_boot_mem_init: can&#8217;t allocate low memory for domain\n </strong>&#8221; &#8221; . Strange as I was sure that the dom0 had plenty of memory and the new guest was defined to use only 768Mb .. so what was the issue ? In fact, nothing related to memory : Our new machines get deployed through a pxe boot menu (with syslinux/pxelinux.0 and pxelinux.cfg) in the Labs zone, but a typo was inserted in that menu so that newer CentOS 5.3 x86_64 machines were in fact &#8230; using i386 repo !  <img src='http://www.arrfab.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>It took me 5 minutes to consult the great oracle (aka google) , find the same issue and look at both new nodes to confirm with `uname -a` that I tried to deploy a x86_64 domU on a i386 dom0 &#8230;</p>
<p>Hehehe, strange that the message is related to memory and not arch .. but several minutes later (and a coffee cup, machines being redeployed correctly *after* the pxelinux.cfg file was modified) everything was back to normal and x86_64 domU&#8217;s running fine &#8230; hope that it can help other people having the same &#8216;typo&#8217; :-p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.arrfab.net/blog/?feed=rss2&amp;p=149</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
